We have to say again that we
are disturbed to see so many comments about government "dysfunction"
regarding the debt ceiling debates in the popular press. The fact is
that our government is working as designed. Tosoc.org's concern is
whether the attitude of the popular press reflects a widespread
dissatisfaction with the processes of democracy in the U.S. We are
concerned whether it reflects a true desire to enforce political
"function" by any means – ultimately meaning giving up
democracy. How long can real democracy last if the people do not want
it anymore?
Just as the purpose of
capitalists is to make money, the purpose of political parties is to
win elections. Do not expect a capitalist to save capitalism if it
costs too much. Capitalism is nice in theory but capitalists are
about the bottom line. Who cares what the economic/political system
is as long as the money is pouring in? The ultimate goal of a
capitalist is to make ever more money and keep doing it until
everyone else is run out of business.
In the same sense, do not
expect a political party to save democracy if it costs too many
elections. Democracy is nice in theory but parties are about winning
elections. Who cares what the political/economic system is as long as
the party wins elections? The ultimate goal of a party is to win ever
more elections and keep doing it until everyone else is run out of
politics.
If a party succeeds in this,
they may still call their system a democracy or a republic because
they continue to have elections. In any meaningful way, however,
their democracy is dead – it has become a zombie democracy like
they have in Zimbabwe. They can have as many elections as they want,
but they cannot change anything.
Another
example is North Korea. There are elections in North Korea, too, but
as we pointed out in The
Rich You Will Always Have With You, the Kim family
is really a dynasty. This became official last August when it was
announced that the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea"
legally had made the Kim family hereditary rulers in its
"constitution," or 10 founding principles. See the UPI
article Hereditary
Rule. Far from being an egalitarian system, the fundamentals of
scientific evolution force Communism to adopt the idea that some
people are better than others and some bloodlines are better than
others. Egalitarianism in Communist systems is an illusion and
genetic superiority is the reality, however hidden it might be by the
illusion. The only surprising thing is that North Korea has now
thrown the illusion away and publicly proclaimed the reality.
All the above means perhaps
that Democracy/Republicanism has the same problem that Capitalism
does. When one or a few participants become enormously powerful
compared to the others, the system becomes competitively unbalanced
and the very people who are representatives of democracy and the
republic actually work to destroy it.
Therefore, instead of
wanting our representatives to join together, pick a goal, and march
unified in one direction, we should cherish it when they publicly
disagree. We should cherish the fact that they are still able to
publicly disagree. We need tolerance and diversity, not hardline
people who will never negotiate. Beware of monolithic, single-party
systems in which everyone by law must agree with the party line.
Tosoc readers, we say again
that the problem facing us is not the debt ceiling or the sequester
or the fiscal cliff or the rising national debt. The true problem is
that we are chained to the rich by the dollar – the single
currency. All those other issues are just manifestations of the rich
jerking the dollar chain to make the rest of us pay more. This will
continue to happen and we will become increasingly impoverished until
we divorce ourselves from the rich by divorcing ourselves from the
single currency. Support tosoc.org.
The way capitalism
should be.
Socialism for the
socialists and capitalism for the capitalists.
TheOtherSideOfCapitalism
(admin@tosoc.org)
Copyright
© 2013 TheOtherSideOfCapitalism
No comments:
Post a Comment